Task 3

 https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture/

Look up the cultural dimension scores for two countries (preferably your home country and another country) at https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison-tool. How could the score differences on the dimensions influence collaboration between the cultures? Give concrete examples, if possible. 

Based on the data, Finland and China exhibit significant cultural differences across Hofstede's dimensions. 

Finland scores 75 in individualism, indicating a society that values independence and personal freedom, while China’s score of 43 shows a collectivist culture that prioritizes group cohesion and relationships. In terms of power distance, Finland’s low score of 33 reflects a society with an emphasis on equality, whereas China’s high score of 80 suggests a hierarchical culture where authority and status are respected. 

Regarding masculinity, Finland’s score of 26 indicates a feminine culture that values quality of life and cooperation. In contrast, China’s score of 66 represents a masculine culture that emphasizes competition and achievement. Uncertainty avoidance is moderately high in Finland 59, showing a preference for rules and structured environments, while China’s lower score of 30 suggests greater tolerance for ambiguity and flexibility. 

For long-term orientation, China scored 77, indicating a culture focused on future rewards and perseverance, while Finland scored 63, reflecting a tendency towards short-term focus and respect for traditions. Lastly, in indulgence, Finland’s score of 57 shows a relatively indulgent society that encourages enjoyment and leisure, whereas China’s score of 24 reveals a restrained culture that emphasizes self-control and adherence to social norms.

How could the score differences on the dimensions influence collaboration between the cultures? Take group work as an example, Finish people may expect each individual to take responsibility for the task we pre-divided, and express their opinions freely and openly, even if they disagree in the group. In contrast, Chinese people may like to maintain harmony in a group and try to avoid direct confrontation, even if they have different thoughts they may keep it in their hearts not to speak out. This kind of situation would lead to misunderstandings Chinese members reluctant to talk and low participation.  

How are these values visible in your everyday life? Focus on some values such as time, hierarchy, individualism, power distance, etc. Analyze your own culture(s) from these viewpoints.

We have low scores of indulgence, showing that Chinese people emphasize discipline, social normal, and hard work. They value time and use the time mostly either studying or working. It is not easy for them to mentally and physically enjoy leisure and personal freedom. 

In conclusion, Finland is characterized by individualism, equality, and a focus on well-being, while China values collectivism, Discipline, and long-term pragmatism. These differences reflect contrasting approaches to societal priorities and interpersonal relationships.